- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 14:35:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21868
O'Neil Delpratt <oneil@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from O'Neil Delpratt <oneil@saxonica.com> ---
Probably the approach to take is to have two variants of the test case:
*one where where we add the dependency expecting the support of serialization
parameters, i.e. satisfied=true.
* The other where were the dependency on the serialization parameters is not
available, i.e. satisfied=false
If you agree, I will make the change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 14:35:51 UTC