- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 14:35:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21868 O'Neil Delpratt <oneil@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from O'Neil Delpratt <oneil@saxonica.com> --- Probably the approach to take is to have two variants of the test case: *one where where we add the dependency expecting the support of serialization parameters, i.e. satisfied=true. * The other where were the dependency on the serialization parameters is not available, i.e. satisfied=false If you agree, I will make the change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 14:35:51 UTC