- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 14:16:02 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19158
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
We decided to accept your suggestion of using a higher-order function. We
looked at the possibility of a fold()-like function, but decided that a simple
mapping function would do the job:
map:for-each-entry(map, function(key, value) => item()*)
There's been a decision to rename fn:map as fn:for-each, so this fits in.
There's also some discussion going on about the order of parameters for
fn:map() and fn:map-pairs and we'll look at aligning with the final outcome on
those.
Pleae close if this resolution is acceptable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 14:16:03 UTC