- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:12:34 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22395 --- Comment #1 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> --- Related to this, "If the calendar >>attribute<< is >>omitted<< an implementation-defined value is used." should this not read "If the calendar >>argument<< is >>the empty sequence<< an implementation-defined value is used." ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:12:36 UTC