- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:26:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19597 --- Comment #23 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> --- (In reply to comment #22) > However, I also think that require/prohibit options should have been moved > to the very top of the query prolog. It feels irritating to me that a > statement can be placed in a query, and will later be prohibited. I completely agree with this and pointed it out some time ago, however it's not easy to fix because of the handling of namespace declarations in the prolog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 11:27:05 UTC