- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:11:11 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19597 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #18) > And the specification also states "If more than one error is present, or if > an error condition comes within the scope of more than one error defined in > this specification, then any non-empty subset of these errors may be > reported." But that's not what we're looking at here. Only one error may be reported, because the implementation is quite clearly prohibited from doing a schema import. Therefore, the implementation never encounters errors by doing a schema import. The condition does not come within the scope of more than one error defined by the specification. > So a processor that does not support module import is allowed to report > either or both of these errors, and therefore a processor for which "import > module" has been disabled is also allowed to report either or both of them. In this case, I think you're actually arguing that if an implementation encounters errors as a result of doing something it is prohibited from doing, it should be allowed to report these spurious errors instead of the errors the specification provides. I don't think that would be a good move. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 20:11:17 UTC