W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2013

[Bug 20642] [FO30] non-hierarchic URIs

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:29:38 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20642-523-VKQuLKJnwB@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |liam@w3.org

--- Comment #6 from Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> ---
Tim, yes, individual URI scheme registrations are responsible for saying
whether a URI is hierarchical.

I agree it's messy, and if a library decides to be over-optimistic and allow
resolution of a relative URI against against, say, a mailto: URI, it's up to
the user not to do that :-) - otherwise you'd be stuck when a new hierarchical
scheme was defined that the library didn't recognise.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 18:29:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:41 UTC