- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:24:51 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20639 --- Comment #10 from dnovatchev@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #6) > You are asking us to change the purpose of XPath and to redesign the > language to suit that purpose. > > This was not one of the requirements for XPath 1.0, XPath 2.0, or XPath 3.0, > and I do not believe it makes sense to hold up XPath 3.0 to consider this > feature. It often happens that a programming language is used not exactly as its authors imagined. The fact of such usage exists -- regardless of the wishes or beliefs of anyone. I think that it is useful to acknowledge the existence of facts sooner than later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 18:24:54 UTC