- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:30:10 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22761 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Should we retain the rule that if there are duplicate keys, the last one wins? When the key/value pairs are evaluated in parallel, this rule is more difficult to implement. Alternative rules: (a) duplicate keys are a dynamic error (b) if there are duplicate keys it is implementation-dependent which one wins I'm inclined towards (a). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 08:30:15 UTC