W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2012

[Bug 18403] Are there any optional functions in F&O 3.0?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:38:14 +0000
Message-Id: <E1Su9Ha-0004Vp-MG@jessica.w3.org>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18403

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-07-25 21:38:14 UTC ---
Or perhaps more relevantly, should the F+O specification allow host languages
to cherry-pick which functions they want to support? In practice host languages
will probably feel entitled to do so whether we license this or not.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 21:38:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:39 UTC