[Bug 18403] Are there any optional functions in F&O 3.0?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18403

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-07-25 21:38:14 UTC ---
Or perhaps more relevantly, should the F+O specification allow host languages
to cherry-pick which functions they want to support? In practice host languages
will probably feel entitled to do so whether we license this or not.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 21:38:15 UTC