W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2012

[Bug 18401] Optional Features in XPath 3.0

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:36:25 +0000
Message-Id: <E1Su9Fp-0004FC-3H@jessica.w3.org>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-07-25 21:36:24 UTC ---
I think the only reasonable candidate for an optional feature is "higher order
functions" which would include the function() sequenceType syntax, inline
functions, function literals (f#n), partial application, dynamic callling,
functions such as fn:map, and functions such as fn:function-name and

I have an open mind as to whether making this an optional feature would be a
good idea. I think that before doing so, we would want to see a reasoned
argument from an implementor or from the developers of a significant host
language (e.g. XForms) as to why the feature is unwanted.

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 21:36:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:39 UTC