W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 14239] New: Function signatures vs. "Function signatures" static context component

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:34:21 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-14239-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

           Summary: Function signatures vs. "Function signatures" static
                    context component
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Working drafts
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XQuery 3.0
        AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@gmail.com
        ReportedBy: ghislain.fourny@flworfound.org
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org

The terminology "function signatures" seems to be used with two different

1. The function signature of any function (inline or not), for example in Function Test, as well as in the definition of function items in the
data model.

2. The function signatures component of the static context, which does not
include the function signatures of (dynamically-produced) inline functions.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 09:34:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:36 UTC