- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:42:02 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13860 Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> 2011-09-10 21:42:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Section 3.9.4 has a paragraph that starts: "In the above example, the > WindowStartCondition and WindowEndCondition are both true(), which causes each > tuple in the binding sequence to be in a separate window." > > For "tuple" read "item". The binding sequence is a sequence of items, not a > sequence of tuples. > > (Also, I think "true", perhaps in code font, is more appropriate than > "true()".) Fixed. > (In passing, I note that this section talks of the items in a sequence as if > they are necessarily distinct. When we change the above to say "causes each > item in the binding sequence to be in a separate window" we are expecting the > reader to understand that when the sequence is ($node, $node, $node, $node, > $node) then by "each item" we are thinking of the sequence as containing five > items, rather than one. Most of the time the meaning is clear. Occasionally, > though, the usage jars: for example the sentence "Thus, no item that occurs in > one window can occur in another window drawn from the same binding sequence." > could easily be misread as saying that if a node $N occurs in one window, then > the same node cannot also occur in another window; but if $N appears twice in > the binding sequence, then this reading is incorrect.) For that one sentence, I added a parenthetical phrase to clarify: <quote> Thus, no item that occurs in one window can occur in another window drawn from the same binding sequence <phrase diff="add">(unless the sequence contains the same item more than once).</phrase> </quote> -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 21:42:04 UTC