W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 12535] [XDM30] Definition of 'tree' missing and apparently non-standard

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:00:18 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R0wCI-0000Lv-5b@jessica.w3.org>

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> 2011-09-06 14:00:15 UTC ---
I added the following note in an effort to resolve this issue:

<note diff="add" at="2011-09-06"><p>This definition of “tree” differs from the
common mathematical
definition where every node can be seen as the root of the nodes below it
and consequently every node belongs to many trees. In XML, the term “tree”
refers to the directed graph that is rooted exclusively at the single
node that has no parent.</p>

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 14:00:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:36 UTC