[Bug 14909] Is method-type pattern in the serialization schema not well defined?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14909

--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Petrovay <gabipetrovay@gmail.com> 2011-11-23 15:27:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I think the pattern as given is actually OK. There are two conditions: it must
> be a valid QName, and it must contain a colon. The type as defined achieves
> this. It would be possible to specify a more restrictive pattern such as
> ".+:.+", but this is unnecessary as this would only exclude strings such as ":"
> which are not valid QNames in the first place.

Yes, I understand that ".*:.*" is the minimum pattern that still enforces the
validity of the method-type. If this is the reasoning behind, than this i not
an issue anymore.

Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 15:27:32 UTC