[Bug 14909] Is method-type pattern in the serialization schema not well defined?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14909

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-11-23 15:09:24 UTC ---
I think the pattern as given is actually OK. There are two conditions: it must
be a valid QName, and it must contain a colon. The type as defined achieves
this. It would be possible to specify a more restrictive pattern such as
".+:.+", but this is unnecessary as this would only exclude strings such as ":"
which are not valid QNames in the first place.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 15:09:28 UTC