W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2011

[Bug 14909] Is method-type pattern in the serialization schema not well defined?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:09:25 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RTERx-0001Uf-KV@jessica.w3.org>

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-11-23 15:09:24 UTC ---
I think the pattern as given is actually OK. There are two conditions: it must
be a valid QName, and it must contain a colon. The type as defined achieves
this. It would be possible to specify a more restrictive pattern such as
".+:.+", but this is unnecessary as this would only exclude strings such as ":"
which are not valid QNames in the first place.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 15:09:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:36 UTC