- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 09:44:23 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12637
Summary: Use of partial-apply() and some smaller bugs in HOF
cases
Product: XML Query Test Suite
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XML Query Test Suite
AssignedTo: benjie.nguyen@gmail.com
ReportedBy: peter.fischer@inf.ethz.ch
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
When looking at the latest CVS version of the XQTS, I noticed some issues in
the HOF cases:
The most import one is that partial-apply() is used in several HOF cases, even
though the latest public XQuery 3.0 says that is has been replaced by the use
of '?'. Affected test cases include hof-027, hof-040 to -045, hof-912, hof-915
to hof-918
There are also some minor bugs:
1) Many test cases include an XML declaration, even though the result is not
valid XML, e.g. hof-001
Expected: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>3, should be 3
2) hof-003 uses a location hint to import a module. This should be replaced or
amended by a module specification in the catalog
3) hof-033, -034 and -035 expect 'uppercase' (as the function name), but
fn:upppercase should also be accepted
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 09:44:25 UTC