- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 09:44:23 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12637 Summary: Use of partial-apply() and some smaller bugs in HOF cases Product: XML Query Test Suite Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XML Query Test Suite AssignedTo: benjie.nguyen@gmail.com ReportedBy: peter.fischer@inf.ethz.ch QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org When looking at the latest CVS version of the XQTS, I noticed some issues in the HOF cases: The most import one is that partial-apply() is used in several HOF cases, even though the latest public XQuery 3.0 says that is has been replaced by the use of '?'. Affected test cases include hof-027, hof-040 to -045, hof-912, hof-915 to hof-918 There are also some minor bugs: 1) Many test cases include an XML declaration, even though the result is not valid XML, e.g. hof-001 Expected: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>3, should be 3 2) hof-003 uses a location hint to import a module. This should be replaced or amended by a module specification in the catalog 3) hof-033, -034 and -035 expect 'uppercase' (as the function name), but fn:upppercase should also be accepted -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 09:44:25 UTC