- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:20:54 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11821 --- Comment #8 from Paul J. Lucas <paul@lucasmail.org> 2011-02-07 21:20:53 UTC --- The goal here (as far as I know) is NOT to do something for the benefit of the specification. It's to do something for the benefit of the language. You could say this is just a semantic argument, but I don't consider allowing expressions where previously only string literals were allowed is another "feature": it's just making an existing feature more flexible. While it's true that more tests might need to be written, such a change is completely backwards compatible: all existing examples and tests would still be valid. As far as delaying the finalization of the recommendation: do you want it fast or right? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 21:20:55 UTC