W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2011

[Bug 11821] [FT] Thesaurus option FTRange

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:58:12 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PmYA0-00078J-AT@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #7 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> 2011-02-07 20:58:11 UTC ---
…true, at first glance; I have many scenarios in mind as well, in which a more
dynamic approach would offer additional possibilities. If I think of the
feedback of our numerous existing XQFT users, however, most people would wish
that the specs would actually allow *less* features.

Imo, the specification won't benefit from even more flexibilty; if the existing
complexity won't satisfy all users, there are enough chances that the language
gets extended in future versions. Last but not least, additional requests will
delay the finalization of the Recommendation even more (as new test cases might
get necessary, etc.), and threaten its wide application.

Just my two cents,

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 20:58:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:45 UTC