- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:42:57 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13674 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-08-08 22:42:56 UTC --- Certainly in Saxon, schema-element(E) will match any element known to be in the substitution group of E - I think the spec is clear on that: <quote> schema-element(E) matches an element if (inter alia) "The name of the candidate node matches ... the name of an element in a substitution group headed by an element named ElementName." - it doesn't say that the element name has to be declared in an imported schema or that the element declaration has to be "in scope" (whatever that might mean). </quote> To make this work, Saxon imposes a rather crude constraint: as soon as a schema namespace is referenced in an "import schema" declaration in any query module, that namespace is "sealed". Sealing a namespace prevents certain changes being made to the schema components in that namespace, in particular, it prevents the substitution group of elements in that namespace being subsequently extended. This is a rather draconian way of ensuring consistency between the compile-time and run-time schemas. The effect is that the full substitution group of an element named in a schema-element() test is always known statically. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 22:42:58 UTC