- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 03:00:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13491
Summary: Variables in group-by clauses
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Working drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XQuery 3.0
AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@gmail.com
ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
The description of "group-by" states "The name of each grouping variable must
be equal (by the eq operator on expanded QNames) to the name of a bound
variable in the input tuple stream; otherwise a static error is raised
[err:XQST0094]."
But the definition of XQST0094 states "In the group by clause of a FLWOR
expression, it is a static error if the name of a grouping variable is not
equal (by the eq operator on expanded QNames) to the name of a variable that is
bound by a for or let clause that precedes the group by clause."
This leaves it unclear whether it is permissible for the grouping variable to
be one that is bound by a previous count, group-by, or window clause.
(I'm also puzzled by the qualifier "bound" in "bound variable". Is it possible
to have unbound variables in the tuple stream?)
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 03:00:05 UTC