- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 03:00:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13491 Summary: Variables in group-by clauses Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Working drafts Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XQuery 3.0 AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@gmail.com ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org The description of "group-by" states "The name of each grouping variable must be equal (by the eq operator on expanded QNames) to the name of a bound variable in the input tuple stream; otherwise a static error is raised [err:XQST0094]." But the definition of XQST0094 states "In the group by clause of a FLWOR expression, it is a static error if the name of a grouping variable is not equal (by the eq operator on expanded QNames) to the name of a variable that is bound by a for or let clause that precedes the group by clause." This leaves it unclear whether it is permissible for the grouping variable to be one that is bound by a previous count, group-by, or window clause. (I'm also puzzled by the qualifier "bound" in "bound variable". Is it possible to have unbound variables in the tuple stream?) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 03:00:05 UTC