- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:30:06 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12455
Summary: [XSLT 3.0] Predicates in new-style patterns
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Working drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSLT 3.0
AssignedTo: mike@saxonica.com
ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
In 5.5.3 rules 5 and 6 we talk of an item "satisfying a predicate". We don't
say exactly what we mean by this. Examples are
~xs:integer[. gt 0]
(foo|bar)[baz]
There are two ways we could define it:
(a) we simply take the effective boolean value of the predicate
(b) we apply the usual rules for filter expressions, with the special
interpretation of [position() = N] if the value is numeric.
Note that numeric predicates here have no practical utility, because the focus
is always a singleton (position() is always 1). So we have a choice between a
rule that is simple (a), or a rule that is consistent with elsewhere (b).
We might also want to reconsider the use of a singleton focus for a pattern
like (foo|bar). It means that match="(foo|bar)[last()]" does not do what the
user probably expects.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 13:30:08 UTC