- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:30:06 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12455 Summary: [XSLT 3.0] Predicates in new-style patterns Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Working drafts Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSLT 3.0 AssignedTo: mike@saxonica.com ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org In 5.5.3 rules 5 and 6 we talk of an item "satisfying a predicate". We don't say exactly what we mean by this. Examples are ~xs:integer[. gt 0] (foo|bar)[baz] There are two ways we could define it: (a) we simply take the effective boolean value of the predicate (b) we apply the usual rules for filter expressions, with the special interpretation of [position() = N] if the value is numeric. Note that numeric predicates here have no practical utility, because the focus is always a singleton (position() is always 1). So we have a choice between a rule that is simple (a), or a rule that is consistent with elsewhere (b). We might also want to reconsider the use of a singleton focus for a pattern like (foo|bar). It means that match="(foo|bar)[last()]" does not do what the user probably expects. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 13:30:08 UTC