- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:46:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11014 Summary: Boolean literals? Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Member-only Editors Drafts Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XQuery 1.1 AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com ReportedBy: jonathan.robie@redhat.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org The following text in "3.1.1 Literals" implies, but does not state, that fn:true() and fn:false() can be used to represent Boolean literals: "The xs:boolean values true and false can be represented by calls to the built-in functions fn:true() and fn:false(), respectively." This comes immediately after a list of examples of literals, and immediately before this text: "Values of other atomic types can be constructed by calling the constructor function for the given type." Do we intend to allow these to be used as literals? The grammar does not support them. We need to clarify this text one way or another. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 14:46:54 UTC