- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:38:04 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9606 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-10-08 12:38:03 UTC --- The solution of using a union type seems attractive, now that they are allowed - in fact, it's a good way of demonstrating the benefits of this new feature. The interesting question is what to call the type, in particular, what namespace to put it in. I guess we could invent something like the old xdt: namespace for the purpose, initially containing only a single type; and XQuery, XSLT, and XPath could define that the types in this namespace are always present in the static context without need for an import. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 8 October 2010 12:38:07 UTC