- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 06:03:23 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9665 --- Comment #4 from Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> 2010-06-23 06:03:23 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Actually, there is no explicit XPath 2.1 Requirements document that I can > reference, so on further inspection, I don't believe there's any change to make > here. I've following concerns: 1. Shouldn't a XPath 2.1 requirements document should exist? I think, for XPath 2.0 it's there. 2. <details> If there's no plan to have an XPath 2.1 requirements document, then can't XPath 2.0 requirements document be referred here? The current text as mentioned in this problem report, seems to convey that this paragraph is only about XQuery 1.1, which IMHO doesn't seem to give accurate information (I think, we should mention XPath 2.x as well). Therefore, would something like following be ok? "The data model is based on the [Infoset] (henceforth "Infoset"), but it requires the following new features to meet the [XPath 2.0] and [XQuery 1.1 Requirements]:" </details> Regards, Mukul -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 06:03:25 UTC