- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:00:45 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9600 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2010-06-15 15:00:45 --- (In reply to comment #8) > The word "existing" seems to imply a particular order of processing. It's > surely possible to express the error as a constraint that doesn't depend on > order of processing. I think the existing text for module import does this nicely. I think we should simply echo this in the text for schema import, using the same language and the same error code to emphasize the parallelism between the two: 4.12 Module Import (current) It is a static error if the expanded QName and arity of a function declared in an imported module are respectively equal to the expanded QName and arity of a function declared in the importing module or in another imported module (even if the declarations are consistent) [err:XQST0034]. 4.11 Schema Import (proposed) It is a static error if the expanded QName and arity of a <diff>constructor function</diff> are respectively equal to the expanded QName and arity of a function declared in the importing module or in another imported module (even if the declarations are consistent) [err:XQST0034]. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 15:00:47 UTC