- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:03:41 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9927 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-06-15 11:03:41 --- Good point. I would think that it makes sense to require it to be a string in the lexical space of xs:positiveInteger. XSLT 2.0 uses exactly the same wording as 1.0, which simply requires a "number". One could argue that "number" in XSLT 1.0 means xs:double, but since there are no clues what to do with non-integer values, it's hard to argue that they should be supported on compatibility grounds. Michael Kay (personal response) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 11:03:43 UTC