- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:40:26 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5577
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-07-16 10:40:25 ---
The WG wants to pursue the composite="yes" direction, implying that the values
of the key are treated as sequences and compared as sequences. Noted that this
could apply uniformly to xsl:key, group-by, xsl:sort, and xsl:merge-key.
Also noted, the idea that xsl:key could generate a function whose name is the
key name, so in place of key('emp-by-name', 'Fred') one could write
emp-by-name('Fred'), subject to issues about namespaces and backwards
compatibility.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 10:40:27 UTC