- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:39:33 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10072 --- Comment #5 from dnovatchev@gmail.com 2010-07-13 13:39:32 --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > [note this is not a WG comment, just an interested observer] > > While it is possible, presenting pi as a function seems weird and unnatural. > Technically it's no different from having true() and false() as functions is > it? In fact it *is* different. We do not have two literal boolean values but we do have numeric literals. While the constructors true() and false() give us a *unique* representation of all possible boolean values, introducing functions to represent numerical constants results in a *redundant* representation for some numerical values. Maybe we should be aware that there are some issues arising from redundancy? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 13:39:37 UTC