- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:31:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4956 --- Comment #22 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-07-06 16:31:50 --- Saxon's results show a large number of differences from those in the comment #21 attachment. Here are the first few: <difference node="739"> <gold>10</gold> <actual>8232</actual> </difference> <difference node="740"> <gold>10</gold> <actual>8232</actual> </difference> <difference node="741"> <gold>10 10</gold> <actual>8232 8232</actual> </difference> <difference node="742"> <gold>10 10</gold> <actual>8232 8232</actual> </difference> Here "gold" means the comment #22 results, "actual" means the Saxon 9.2 results. Clearly the product that produced the comment #22 results differs from Saxon in its handling of the character 8232 (x2028, the Unicode line separator character). This character has a special meaning in XML 1.1 so there may be legitimate differences here. Saxon is still showing the same three differences from the CVS reference results as reported in comment #15 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 16:31:52 UTC