- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 04:37:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10073 Summary: Problems with the definitions of the trigonometric functions (math:) Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Working drafts Platform: PC URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-11/#trigonometry OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Functions and Operators 1.1 AssignedTo: mike@saxonica.com ReportedBy: dnovatchev@gmail.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org There are a number of problems with the way trigonometric functions are currently defined in the WD of F&O 1.1: 1. The name of the group of functions. The widely accepted term is "trigonometric" functions, not "trigonometrical" which is used in section 4.7. 2. The table at the start of section 4.7 in its column "Meaning" specifies the range of the three reverse trigonometric functions. However the range of the trigonometric functions (sin(), cos() and tan()) are not specified. Why is this selectivity? 3. The term "range" is used without specifying if this is closed or semi-closed or open range. 4. The summary of 4.7.1 for math:pi() states: "Returns the value of the mathematical constant ð". This is not true. ð is a transcendental number and its value cannot be expressed as a number with finite number of digits (in any numerical system), thus its value cannot be returned. We always work wit more or less *approximation* of pi. 5. Section 4.7.2 math:sqrt states: "Returns the square root of the argument". This is incorrect, because every positive number has *two* square roots -- a positive and a negative one. I guess that what the document meant was to return the positive square root of the argument. Another problem is that sqrt() is not a trigonometric function at all and should not be defined in section 4.7 (this has been filed as a separate bug). 6. Unnecessary limitation for the arguments of math:sin(), math:cos() and math:tan(). In the corresponding sections it is stated that: "If $è is in the range -2ð to +2ð then the result is the xs:double value ·either side of the mathematical sine of the angle; if it is outside this range, then the precision of the result is ·implementation-dependent". It is very unclear how the interval -2ð to +2ð (closed or open) was chosen. There isn't any technical problem of calculating the value of these functions with the same accuracy for any value in the domain of the functions. In case the chosen interval is a hint for a desired method of implementation, then this is not the best hint. It will be cumbersome, repetitive, time consuming and error-prone for the users to always specify their own code that gets the remainder of the argument modulo 2ð. 7. "Either side of". This is defined as: "[Definition] In this section, when the rules for a function say that the returned value must be the xs:double either side of some mathematical quantity, then if the mathematical quantity is precisely representable in the value space of xs:double the exact result must be returned; otherwise it is acceptable to return either the nearest higher xs:double or the nearest lower xs:double, and it is ·implementation-dependent· which of the two is returned". The problem with this is that generally it is challenging to test if a given returned value is really "the either side of" of the value of the mathematical function (typically an irrational number). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 3 July 2010 04:37:51 UTC