- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:58:44 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8006 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-10-22 16:58:44 --- >In any case, a spec shouldn't include an example (like the one in 2.4.5) that contradicts the rules of the spec itself, right? There are many examples in the XQuery specification that fail static typing. Our usual approach is to add a note to that effect alongside the example. It would be unreasonable to require all examples to pass static typing, since most implementations do not support the feature, and most users can therefore use such example code without any trouble. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:58:48 UTC