- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:48:54 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8006 --- Comment #2 from Markos Zaharioudakis <markos_za@yahoo.com> 2009-10-22 16:48:53 --- I don't think that the example insert node <x/> into //a would fail static typing, because the ST rule for the target expression of "insert into" is element*. In general, except for transform, the ST rules for all of the other updating expressions do not place a constraint on node cardinality. So, I was thinking that the transform rule may have a typo error: node() instead of node()*. In any case, a spec shouldn't include an example (like the one in 2.4.5) that contradicts the rules of the spec itself, right? So, either the transform ST rule should change, or the example in 2.4.5 (and several tests in the XQUF test suite as well) be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:48:57 UTC