- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:14:08 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8398
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-11-30 11:14:07 ---
I think one could defend the example on the grounds that the stated requirement
is for the output to be "unsorted", i.e. the user does not care what the result
order is, and the provided code meets this requirement. However I agree it
would be clearer if the published code delivered the published output as shown.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 11:14:09 UTC