- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:57:34 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8398 --- Comment #2 from Martin Honnen <martin.honnen@gmx.de> 2009-11-30 17:57:34 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think one could defend the example on the grounds that the stated requirement > is for the output to be "unsorted", i.e. the user does not care what the result > order is, and the provided code meets this requirement. However I agree it > would be clearer if the published code delivered the published output as shown. When I filed this "bug" I had focused on the sample input, output, and XSLT code in the specification. Based on your comment I reread the text accompanying the example again and see that it says "The four columns are to contain [...] third, a comma-separated alphabetical list of the city names within that country". That means the order "Lyon, Paris" is what the textual description specifies, an alphabetical list. Only in that case the XSLT sample does not achieve what the textual description requires, as it outputs "Paris, Lyon". So somehow the textual description, the sample output and the sample XSLT code need to be aligned. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 17:57:43 UTC