- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:04 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8253 --- Comment #3 from Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> 2009-11-10 09:45:04 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Reclassifying this as input to XSLT 2.1. > > I don't have strong views on it either way. > > There's been a related request to allow xsl:variable to appear before xsl:sort. To be able to specify xsl:variable before xsl:sort is quite useful, and can solve quite a number of new use cases. But specifying xsl:variable between xsl:param's doesn't look good to me. To my thinking, that would violate the widely accepted norms of subroutine structure. Regards, Mukul -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2009 09:45:13 UTC