- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:45:26 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6927
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-05-20 19:45:26 ---
Good catch, I think you are right.
Perhaps we could use "outerfor" as a single word.
Though I really wonder how many people understand this "outer" terminology
anyway? Not all our users have done a computer science SQL course, and even
those who have might not immediately see the relevance. It seems very obscurely
related to the actual semantics. Might something like
for $x emptiable? in EXPR
be better?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 19:45:36 UTC