http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6927 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike@saxonica.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-05-20 19:45:26 --- Good catch, I think you are right. Perhaps we could use "outerfor" as a single word. Though I really wonder how many people understand this "outer" terminology anyway? Not all our users have done a computer science SQL course, and even those who have might not immediately see the relevance. It seems very obscurely related to the actual semantics. Might something like for $x emptiable? in EXPR be better? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 19:45:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:27 UTC