- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:35:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5771
Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> 2009-02-25 21:35:18 ---
Closed as "INVALID". People can write image handling libraries, but
let's not introduce such a thing a feature at a time.
The Working Groups considered the original request, and today considered your
clarification. We don't feel at this time that the work needed to expand
handling of binary data is justified, particularly as we don't have clear
use cases or examples. But if you end up developing such a library and
it proves popular, it would quite likely be a candidate for standardisation
in some future version of Functions and operators.
The unparsed-text function is another matter, and we'll track that separately.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 21:35:28 UTC