http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5671 --- Comment #16 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2009-02-24 08:48:48 --- Those changes are improvements, but I think there's still the problem, raised in comment #9, of the wording: Numeric and xs:anyURI values are converted to the least common type... The question is: the least common type of what? I claim that a plausible answer is: the least common type of the numeric and/or xs:anyURI values in the input sequence (i.e., the values identified in the sentence's subject), which leads to unintended results. In comment #10, you say that your reading is: the least common type of all the items in the input sequence which I say is a non-obvious reading. Moreover, I believe the wording still indicates that, if you call the function with a sequence of xs:anyURI values and a collation, the values are compared using the default collation, not the supplied collation. I'm still wondering if that's intended. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 08:48:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:26 UTC