- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:30:34 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4273 --- Comment #46 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2009-02-17 09:30:34 --- Regarding Comment #45, yes - I was talking about the 'preserve' case. As this is the default construction mode, I'm guessing casual users not realise the benefits of 'strip'. "When construction mode is 'preserve', it can't succeed because the XQuery spec mandates a type annotation of xs:anyType for a constructed node, so soundness dictates that FS can't infer anything more specific for the constructor expression." ...and yet at runtime we can be sure that fn:data applied to such an element will be xs:untypedAtomic. Is there nothing that can be done to improve matters? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 09:30:47 UTC