- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:02:47 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 --- Comment #4 from Jin <jin.phd@gmail.com> 2009-02-15 01:02:47 --- Hi, Michael Kay: Thanks for your reply. In fact, I want to extract part of testsuite to test XPath2 experssion only. I find the words "These XPath 2.0 test cases are identified in the test suite catalog." in the webpage[1]. so I think this is a good starting point. but... The <a/> seem a element direct construction, so I think it is not the XPath2 grammar. And of course, the section of query prolog should be stripped as you as said. Your words, "(a) it's almost certainly true that the current values of this attribute are not 100% reliable", is true really. Some test cases with is-XPath="false" are XPath2, but some with "true" is not true now. The best way is to use a parser can identify the two different grammar(or the xpath2 grammar), and test the xpath2 only. One thing is the parser should be proven in its quality... [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Query/test-suite/ -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 15 February 2009 01:02:56 UTC