- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:20:07 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6559
Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jmdyck@ibiblio.org
--- Comment #1 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2009-02-11 21:20:06 ---
> It would seem reasonable that the normaliztion rules for constructed
> processing instructions would be updated along the lines of:
>
> [processing-instruction StringLiteral{ Expr }]Expr
> ==
> processing-instruction { xs:NCName(StringLiteral) }{
> fs:item-sequence-to-untypedAtomic-PI(( [Expr]Expr)) }
So far, the discussion (in the referenced bugs) has been about PITest.
Are you sure you want to bring in CompPIConstructor?
Also, note that there's no such syntax as
processing-instruction StringLiteral { Expr }
You're maybe thinking of
processing-instruction { StringLiteral } { Expr }
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 21:20:16 UTC