- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:09:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6288 Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2009-02-10 13:09:30 --- I am fixing this by adding a note to the example: Solution 2 (using a recursive updating function): declare updating function local:delete-subtree($p as element(part)) { for $child in doc("part-list.xml")//part where $p/@partid eq $child/@partof return ( delete nodes $child, local:delete-subtree($child) ) }; for $p in doc("part-list.xml")//part[@name="car"] return local:delete-subtree($p) NOTE: Because this data is not covered by a schema, an implementation that supports static typing will raise an error for the comparison $p/@partid eq $child/@partof. This can be solved by creating a schema for the data and importing it into the query. Please let me know if this is not sufficient. Jonathan -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2009 13:09:41 UTC