- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:03:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6538 Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Inconsistent following- |[FS] Inconsistent following- |sibling behaviour of |sibling behaviour of |attribute nodes |attribute nodes --- Comment #1 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2009-02-08 07:03:53 --- I agree, FS's normalization rule for following-sibling is incorrect. I propose we fix it by adding a 'where' clause to the right-hand side: [ let $e := . where fn:not($e/self::attribute()) return $e/parent::node()/child:: NodeTest [.>>$e] ]_Expr And thanks for the heads-up re the following:: axis, although I believe the danger is not that it would mistakenly yield an empty sequence, but rather that it would yield a sequence that is missing the descendants of the attribute's parent. We could add them in explicitly, but I think that would be fairly ugly. Instead, I suggest we go back to the definition: the 'following' axis contains all nodes that are descendants of the root of the tree in which the context node is found, are not descendants of the context node, and occur after the context node in document order and express it thusly: [ following:: NodeTest ]_Axis == [ let $e := . return fn:root() / descendant:: NodeTest [. >> $e] except $e / descendant::node() ]_Expr -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 8 February 2009 07:04:03 UTC