- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:53:15 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6223 --- Comment #14 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> 2009-02-04 11:53:14 --- Dear Pat, thank you for the updates on my comments. Yes, I think it is a good idea to use the 'inspect' property for handling scoring queries. - Just a last note to comment #17: > [17] ...I would expect <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>... > as second result. > > --<title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>'s <p> doesn't contain "usability > testing" so even if it has the same following sibling as <title>Usability > Testing></title>'s <p>, I don't see it as a possible result. Sure I built > these to work one way and that might make it harder for me to see > alternatives. Let me know if you disagree. I just tested this one again, and indeed it was wrong from me to talk about a "second result". Instead, the query is supposed to return all chapters, and only the one is shown in the result which contains the keywords. Below I've attached the current and the expected result: === QUERY ========================================================= for $book in $input-context/books/book let $chapters := $book//chapter where $chapters[./p ftcontains "usability testing" and ./p/following-sibling::p ftcontains "information architecture"] return ($book/metadata/title, $chapters) --- CURRENT ------------------------------------------------------- <title shortTitle="Improving Web Site Usability">Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title> <chapter> <title>Usability Testing</title> <p>Once the problems identified by expert reviews have been corrected, it is time to conduct some tests of the site with your unique audience or audiences by conducting usability testing.</p> <p>Users are asked to complete tasks which measure the success of the information architecture and navigational elements of the site.</p> <p>Then changes are made to improve service to users.</p> </chapter> --- EXPECTED ------------------------------------------------------ <title shortTitle="Improving Web Site Usability">Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title> <chapter> <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title> <p>Expert reviewers critique an interface to determine conformance with recognized usability principles.<footnote>One of the best known lists of heuristics is<citation url="http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html">Ten Usability Heuristics by Jacob Nielson</citation>. Another is<citation url="http://usability.gov/guidelines/index.html">Research-Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines</citation> </footnote> </p> </chapter> <chapter> <title>Cognitive Walk-Through</title> <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site understandability and ease of learning while performing specified tasks. They walk through the site answering questions such as "Would a user know by looking at the screen how to complete the first step of the task?" and "If the user completed the first step, would the user know what to do next?," with the goal of identifying any obstacles to completing the task and assessing whether the user would cognitively be aware that he was successful in completing a step in the process.</p> </chapter> <chapter> <title>Usability Testing</title> <p>Once the problems identified by expert reviews have been corrected, it is time to conduct some tests of the site with your unique audience or audiences by conducting usability testing.</p> <p>Users are asked to complete tasks which measure the success of the information architecture and navigational elements of the site.</p> <p>Then changes are made to improve service to users.</p> </chapter> Thanks, Christian, BaseX Team http://www.basex.org -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 11:53:23 UTC