- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:53:15 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6223
--- Comment #14 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> 2009-02-04 11:53:14 ---
Dear Pat,
thank you for the updates on my comments. Yes, I think it is a good idea to use
the 'inspect' property for handling scoring queries. - Just a last note to
comment #17:
> [17] ...I would expect <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>...
> as second result.
>
> --<title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>'s <p> doesn't contain "usability
> testing" so even if it has the same following sibling as <title>Usability
> Testing></title>'s <p>, I don't see it as a possible result. Sure I built
> these to work one way and that might make it harder for me to see
> alternatives. Let me know if you disagree.
I just tested this one again, and indeed it was wrong from me to talk about a
"second result". Instead, the query is supposed to return all chapters, and
only the one is shown in the result which contains the keywords. Below I've
attached the current and the expected result:
=== QUERY =========================================================
for $book in $input-context/books/book
let $chapters := $book//chapter
where $chapters[./p ftcontains "usability
testing" and ./p/following-sibling::p ftcontains
"information architecture"]
return ($book/metadata/title, $chapters)
--- CURRENT -------------------------------------------------------
<title shortTitle="Improving Web Site Usability">Improving
the Usability of a Web Site Through Expert Reviews and
Usability Testing</title>
<chapter>
<title>Usability Testing</title>
<p>Once the problems identified by expert
reviews have been corrected, it is time to
conduct some tests of the site with your unique
audience or audiences by conducting usability
testing.</p>
<p>Users are asked to complete tasks which
measure the success of the information
architecture and navigational elements of the
site.</p>
<p>Then changes are made to improve service to
users.</p>
</chapter>
--- EXPECTED ------------------------------------------------------
<title shortTitle="Improving Web Site Usability">Improving
the Usability of a Web Site Through Expert Reviews and
Usability Testing</title>
<chapter>
<title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>
<p>Expert reviewers critique an interface to
determine conformance with recognized
usability principles.<footnote>One of the
best known lists of heuristics is<citation
url="http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html">Ten Usability
Heuristics by Jacob Nielson</citation>. Another
is<citation
url="http://usability.gov/guidelines/index.html">Research-Based Web
Design and Usability Guidelines</citation>
</footnote>
</p>
</chapter>
<chapter>
<title>Cognitive Walk-Through</title>
<p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site
understandability and ease of learning while
performing specified tasks. They walk through
the site answering questions such as "Would a
user know by looking at the screen how to
complete the first step of the task?" and "If
the user completed the first step, would the
user know what to do next?," with the goal of
identifying any obstacles to completing the
task and assessing whether the user would
cognitively be aware that he was successful in
completing a step in the process.</p>
</chapter>
<chapter>
<title>Usability Testing</title>
<p>Once the problems identified by expert
reviews have been corrected, it is time to
conduct some tests of the site with your unique
audience or audiences by conducting usability
testing.</p>
<p>Users are asked to complete tasks which
measure the success of the information
architecture and navigational elements of the
site.</p>
<p>Then changes are made to improve service to
users.</p>
</chapter>
Thanks,
Christian, BaseX Team
http://www.basex.org
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 11:53:23 UTC