W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2009

[Bug 6223] [XQFTTS] cont.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:02:21 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1LUSPV-00039e-UL@wiggum.w3.org>


--- Comment #13 from Pat Case <pcase@crs.loc.gov>  2009-02-03 21:02:21 ---
One more Christian,

I am revisiting items 16-18 as requested in comment 8.

[16] RESULT axes-queries-results-q2.txt

Your addition al commnet:
thanks once more for the detailed bug fix comments! A small addition to
[16]-[18]: Sorry, I wanted to say that I expected other results in these
queries. For example, in [16] I would expect the following result (the title
"Improving Web Site Usability" is not included in the XQFT version

...I would expect <title shortTitle="Improving Web Site Usability...">...
as first result
<title shortTitle="Improving Web Site Usability">Improving 
      the Usability of a Web Site Through Expert Reviews and 
      Usability Testing</title>
<title shortTitle="Usability Basics">Usability 
      Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct Usability Tests 
      on Web Site Thereby Improving the Usability of Your 
      Web Site</title>
<step number="1">Clarify and 
            articulate the goal of the usability testing.</step>
<step number="2">Identify tasks which 
            are critical for users to be able to complete 

--Fair enough. I added your expected result as an alternative result for

[17] RESULT axes-queries-results-q4.txt

...I would expect <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>...
as second result.

--<title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>'s <p> doesn't contain "usability testing"
so even if it has the same following sibling as <title>Usability
Testing></title>'s <p>, I don't see it as a possible result. Sure I built these
to work one way and that might make it harder for me to see alternatives. Let
me know if you disagree.

[18] RESULT full-text-composability-queries-results-q4.txt

...I would expect <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title> ...
as second result.

--<title>Heuristic Evaluation</title> is as I expect you know a chapter title,
so I think you are recommending also returning Book 1: Improving, which to my
surprise does come close to being a valid result, except I think it is excluded
by the ftnot ("montana" ftand "marigold"). Same disclaimer as above. Let me
know if you disagree.


Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 21:02:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:26 UTC