- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:59:29 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7424 --- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-08-26 10:59:29 --- If I weren't the owner of an implementation, I would argue: (a) your case would have merit if we were designing the spec now (b) however, the fact that a change is an improvement is not a good enough argument to make the change retrospectively. As it is, I *am* an implementor, and I have discovered that my implementation works the way you would like the spec to say it should. In that situation, all I can say is that I am torn, and will accept the views of the WG on the matter. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 10:59:39 UTC