- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:08:16 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6131 Nikolay Ognyanov <nikolay.ognyanov@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nikolay.ognyanov@gmail.com --- Comment #22 from Nikolay Ognyanov <nikolay.ognyanov@gmail.com> 2009-08-22 19:08:15 --- There are multiple rules where ExprSingle can be followed by "keyword" which is not really reserved and can, depending on the context, also represent NCName. With computed constructors and some other expressions ending with a curly bracket construct there are lot of opportunities to invalidate currently valid XQuery 1.0 expressions by treating everything which looks like a Clark name as Clark name. Excluding whitespaces does not really help because in the situations mentioned above they are allowed but not required. Here is an example : for $a in element b {scheme:path-rootless}return c This perfectly valid XQuery 1.0 expression would be invalidated if "{scheme:path-rootless}return" is treated as Clark name. At the same time XQuery 1.1. requirements mandate 100% backward compatibility with XQuery 1.0 by saying "Every valid XQuery 1.0 expression MUST be valid in XQuery 1.1 and it MUST evaluate to the same result.". So unless backward compatibility requirements are relaxed (which does not seem very likely or/and very good idea), Clark names can not be introduced in XQuery 1.1. the way suggested above even regardless of other issues which could be brought up. This is a pity but curly braces are so widely (over)used in XQuery and its extensions that introduction of new "naked" curly bracket constructs seems to always turn out harmful one way or another and even curly bracket constructs guarded by lead-in/follow-up words can cause problems, especially when those words are reused in multiple rules. The syntax that I would vote for is : EQname: QName | UriLiteral ':' NCName /* ws:explicit */ It is very similar to the initial suggestion but does not introduce new delimiter and UriLiteral is already in use in XQuery, so it should better be reused here. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 19:08:27 UTC