- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:52:42 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6808 --- Comment #5 from Andy Agrawal <guerneca2003@yahoo.com> 2009-08-21 21:52:41 --- Henry, I know of existing implementations that are already implementing the indentation rules this way i.e. in the less restrictive fashion. I think the intent of the specification was that indentation should not ever add significant whitespace and this particular rule is a bit of an overkill for that. Therefore, my suggestion is to treat it as an erratum. Existing implementations will indeed "break" in the sense that they will fail conformance test even though they are doing the right thing i.e. never adding significant whitespace. For these reasons, I'd suggest not waiting until 1.1. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 21 August 2009 21:52:50 UTC