- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:16:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5332 --- Comment #18 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-04-28 09:16:28 --- >An extensional definition has to state what constructs are vacuous What the agreed definition does is to say that the detail is to be found elsewhere. >I suggest we hash this out on today's call. We spent some time on this before, I personally don't see why it needs to be reopened. Michael Kay -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 09:16:38 UTC