- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:53:21 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6802 Summary: [FT] Test Suite Revised Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Full Text 1.0 AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org ReportedBy: christian.gruen@gmail.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Hi all, I've now locally fixed most whitespace issues and will upload them if I have the login data. I have fixed some other small bugs, and I did my best to avoid new bugs. Below you find some other issues I came across (I could have directly fixed some of them, but I felt it was better to let you know): [1] examples-364-2.xq I mentioned this one before (bug #6665). This query will only yield true if <p> is defined as paragraph delimiter. So it might be helpful if the comparison mode was set to "Inspect" - or if <p> could somewhat be defined as default delimiter in the test suite. [2] FTAnd-badexpr1.xq An exception (XPTY0004) is thrown here as the FTWordsValue is an empty expression - but I didn't find a hint why this is not allowed. Could you give me some hints? [3] ftstemming-q5.xq I would only expect one book as result (the first one), as the second book does not contain a stemmed "improve" term. [4] FTOrder-andor1.xq The query uses the following ftcontains expression: ...[/books/book/para ftcontains("swift" ftand "persuasion") ftor ("ninja" ftand "software") ordered]... One <para> element contains all four terms. As "swift" and "persuasion" appear in the correct order, I wouldd intuitively assume a match here. Instead, the propsed result is empty. But maybe I got this one wrong.. [5] FTDistance-complexwords4.xq, FTDistance-complexexpr2.xq, FTDistance-complexexpr1.xq, FTDistance-complexexpr3.xq The current results accept the term "Usability Studies", which is actually excluded by the query. The correct result probably is <title>Software For Fun and Profit, 2nd edition</title> [6] FTDistance-complexwords5.xq I'm not sure: can "window 0 words", which is used here, yield any results at all? I would expect "2" as minimum. Next, is the distance here 2 or 3 words? [7] FTScope-q3.xq, FTScope-q4.xq See [1]; <p> is implicitly assumed as paragraph delimiter. [8] FTNot-q1.xq, FTContent-q2.xq, FTNot-unconstrained-q1.xq As <para> does not occur in all the <book> elements, the results of the three queries should each contain only four <title> elements. [9] full-text-composability-queries-results-q5.xq The "if/then/else" expression is parsed and output as part of the text node: ...if (count($book/metadata/author) > 0) ... [10] xquery-xpath-composability-queries-results-q9.xq I get the expected result if the count(..) function is rewritten a little: old: count(./part/chapter) * 3 new: count($cont/part/chapter) * 4 [11] ftmatchoptions-q1.xq, ftlanguage-q2.xq Alternative error "FTST0009" missing. [12] Extension3.xq Parsing issue; the second option must be prefixed by "option": ...option ex:option2... [13] FTWindow-sentences1.xq, FTWindow-sentences3.xq, FTWindow-paragraphs1.xq, FTWindow-paragraphs3.xq, FTWindow-complexwords3.xq Parsing issue: "exactly " obsolete. [14] FTWindow-paragraphs1.xq See [1].. <p> is expected to delimit paragraphs. [15] ftstopword-q4.xq - ftstopword-q9.xq "StopWordList1.xml" does not exist ("StopWordList.xml" ?) [16] ftstopword-q4.xq, ftstopword-q7.xq, ftstopword-q8.xq "union" -> "union at" / "except" -> "except at" [17] ftstopword-q7.xq "FTST0008" expected, as StopWordList3.xml is missing. [18] ftstopword-q9.xq Parsing issue; superfluous "(" [19] ForScoreExpr-2.xq, ForScoreExpr-4.xq "as xs:string" should be removed (XPTY0004, type mismatch). [20] FTContent-complex2.xq "50..." FTUnit missing (probably "words"). [21] FTSelection-Weight-q1f.xq, FTSelection-Weight-q1g.xq, FTSelection-Weight-q1h.xq "as xs:double" should be removed (XPTY0004, type mismatch). [22] FTIgnore-q2.xq Alternative error "FTST0007" missing. I hope/guess that most XQFTTS bugs will be fixed after this has been discussed. Best, Christian -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 22:53:31 UTC